
|
The cultural logic and expressions of Nike’s ads call to mind questions of normativity, race, sexuality, and the undertones therein that are communicated to the individuals passing by each advertisement. As Sut Jhally (1955 - ) writes, “Advertising
thus
does not work by creating values and attitudes
out of
nothing but by drawing upon and rechanneling concerns that the target
audience (and the culture) already shares” (1995:79).
In trying to decip her
the mechanistic qualities of
Nike’s
ads, we
employ Jhally’s theories about how ads as cultural icons
evoke
modalities of discourse and the possible
implications, potentially
violent, subversive, or injurious, of the subject matter. The semiotics
of advertising is imperative in understanding and
analyzing
ads for
consumers cannot, whether consciously or subconsciously, look past
intersecting intentionalities, embodiments, and consequent
repercussions when judging the text, pictures, and embodied
persons
within advertisements.The goal of our analysis is to elucidate the significance of iconicity and indexicality within the composition of these advertisements to unearth the intersection of sexuality, race, and related cultural inclinations. |
||||||||