Economics 351 
Noelwah R. Netusil
Fall 2008  
Vollum 227, x7306
Syllabus  
                                                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                                          

                                                                                                                                        

 

Environmental Economics

 

Course Objective: This course will introduce students to the methods economists use to analyze issues related to the environment.  We will discuss the positive and normative aspects of environmental economics, techniques that are used to value the environment, and approaches -- such as regulation and incentive-based programs -- that are used to control pollution.  This course is taught with the expectation that students have completed Economics 201.

 

Office Hours: Office hours will be held in Vollum 227 on Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays from 3:30-4:30pm. Students who are unable to come during these times are encouraged to make an appointment.

 

Text and Required Readings: The principal text for this course is Environmental Economics by Charles D. Kolstad.  In addition to the text, students are responsible for the required readings and for additional readings that will occasionally be announced in class.  Students are expected to contribute to class discussions by finding examples of current environmental issues in the business, financial, and general press.

 

Evaluation: Evaluation will be based on three homework assignments, a midterm exam, a comprehensive final examination, participation in a group project or writing a 10-15 page independent research paper, and class participation.  Every student should be prepared to contribute meaningfully to every class session.

 

Collaboration: All work submitted during this course is expected to reflect the effort of the individual whose name appears on top of the assignment.  You are encouraged to work with friends, tutors and the instructor on problem sets. However, when the time comes to write your assignment, it must be your work and should be written in words that reflect your understanding of the material.

 

Citations: Citations should be used when appropriate and should conform to the guidelines in the Citation Guide for Papers and Theses in Economics.

 

Materials on Reserve: The following texts are on 2-hour reserve; other required readings are available electronically.  Readings marked with a * are optional.

 

Easton, Thomas A. 2007.  Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Environmental Issues (12th edition) Guilford, CT: McGraw Hill/Dushkin.

 

Goldfarb, Theodore D. 2001. Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Environmental Issues (9th edition) Guilford, CT: McGraw Hill/Dushkin.

 

Kahn, Matthew E. 2006. Green Cities:  Urban Growth and the Environment.  Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

 

Kolstad, Charles D. 2000. Environmental Economics New York, New York: Oxford University Press.

 

Lomborg, Bjorn. 2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.

 

Pindyck, Robert S. and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 2005. Microeconomics (6th edition) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

 


Outline and Reading List

 

I. Introduction

 

September 3

What is environmental economics and how does it differ from natural resource economics and ecological economics?  What is the current state of the environment?  How can we use economics to analyze environmental issues?

 

Kolstad, Chapters 1 and 2 (to page 14)

 

Lackey, Robert T.  2006. Axioms of Ecological Policy. Fisheries. 31 (6): 286-290.

 

Lomborg, Bjorn.  The Skeptical Environmentalist. Chapter 1.

 

Pimentel, D. 2002. Skeptical of the Skeptical Environmentalist. Skeptic 9(2): 90-94.

 

September 5

What instruments are used to reduce pollution?  Why do some countries rely on a regulatory approach while other countries use incentive-based approaches?  What role do institutions play in reducing pollution?  Are existing programs effective?  How do we determine if a program is effective?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 2 (page 14 to end).

 

Helm, Dieter. 2003.  The Assessment: Climate-Change Policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 19(3):  349-361.

 

Pasurka, Carl. 2008. Perspectives on Pollution Abatement and Competitiveness: Theory, Data, and Analyses Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(2): 194-218.

 

*Pizer, William A. and Raymond Kopp. 2003. Calculating the Costs of Environmental Regulation Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 03-06.

 

OECD/EEA database on instruments used for environmental policy and natural resources management

 


II. Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics

 

A.  Welfare Economics

 

September 8 and 10

What is sustainability?  How can society make choices that incorporate its members' values?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 3

 

McMichael, A.J., C.D. Butler, and Carl Folke. 2003. New Visions for Addressing Sustainability. Science. (December 12): 1919-1920.

 

Bailey, Ronald. 2002. Wilting Greens Reason (December).

 

Payne, Dinah M. and Cecily A. Raiborn. 2004. Sustainable Development:  The Ethics Supports the Economics Journal of Business Ethics 2(2): 157-168.

 

Rifkin, Jeremy. 2005. The European Dream:  Building Sustainable Development in a Globally Connected World. E Magazine (March/April): 34-39.

 

Kahn, Joseph and Jim Yardley. 2008. Choking on Growth The New York Times (ten part series with video and interactive maps).

 

*Arrow, Kenneth, Partha Dasgupta, Lawrence Goulder, Gretchen Daily, et al.2004. Are We Consuming Too Much? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(3) 147-172.

 

*Kneese, Allen V. and William D. Schulze " Ethics and Environmental Economics" In Handbook of Natural Resource Economics, Vol. 1, ed. A.V. Kneese and J. L. Sweeney. New York: Elsevier, 1985: 368-378.

 

B. Efficiency

 

September 12

What do economists mean by the term "efficiency"?  Should economic policy be efficient?  How do we determine if policies are efficient?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 4 (to page 64)

 

*Fullerton, Don and Robert Stavins. 1998. How Economists See the Environment Nature 395(6701) 433-434.

 

September 15 and 17

What is benefit-cost analysis?  What are some criticisms of this technique?  What alternative approaches can be used to evaluate environmental policies?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 4 (page 68 to end)

 

Gayer, Ted and Robert W. Hahn. 2005. Designing Environmental Policy:  Lessons from the Regulation of Mercury Emissions.  AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies Regulatory Analysis 05-01.

 

The Economist. 2005.  The Regulators' Best Friend? (April 2): 72.

 

Heinzerlin, Lisa and Frank Ackerman. 2002. Pricing the Priceless:  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection. Georgetown Environmental Law and Policy Institute: Georgetown University Law Center.

 

Murdoch, William, Stephen Polasky, Kerrie A. Wilson, Hugh P. Possingham, Peter Kareiva, and Rebecca Shaw. 2007. Maximizing Return on Investment in Conservation Biological Conservation 139 (3-4): 375-388.
 

Office of Management and Budget Economic Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive Order 12866 (especially section III)

 

*Arrow, Kenneth J., Maureen L. Cropper, George C. Eads, et al. 1996. Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation? Science 272: 221-222.

 

*Kelman, Steven. Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique. Pages 129-136 in Glickman, Theodore S. and Michael Gough (eds.). 1990.  Readings in Risk Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

 

*Butters, Gerard et al. Reply to Steven Kelman. Pages 136-137 in Glickman, Theodore S. and Michael Gough (eds.). 1990.  Readings in Risk Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

 

*Hahn, Robert W. and Patrick M. Dudley. 2007. How Well Does the U.S. Government Do Benefit-Cost Analysis? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(2) 192-211.

 

*Hanley, Nick and Clive L. Spash. 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Co.

 

*Pearce, David W., Giles Atkinson, and Susana Mourato. 2006. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment:  Recent Developments. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

 

*Portney, Paul R. and John P. Weyant (eds.). 1999. Discounting and Intergenerational Equity Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

 

 

September 19 - Class Cancelled

 

C. Externalities and Property Rights

What are externalities?  How can we internalize externalities?  What is the Coase theorem and how can it be applied?

 

September 22, 24 and 26

 

Kolstad, Chapter 5

 

Kolstad, Chapter 6

 

Coase, Ronald H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics (October): 1-44.

 


III. Controlling Pollution

 

September 29 and October 1

 

A. Pigouvian Fees

What is a Pigouvian fee?  How should the fee be set?  Does a fee on emissions have the same effect as a subsidy for pollution abatement?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 7

 

Leape, Jonathan. 2006. The London Congestion Charge. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4): 157-176.

 

*Nordhaus, William D. 2007. To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slowing Global Warming Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(1) 26-44.

 

B. Regulation

 

October 3

 

What are the reasons for government intervention?  What are the advantages and disadvantages of a command and control approach?  Are regulations efficient?  Cost-effective?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 8

 

Knickerbocker, Brad. 2003. How Economics May Reshape Green Policy Christian Science Monitor (October 3).

 

C. Marketable Permits

What is the theoretical basis for a marketable permit approach?  What are some practical challenges in using marketable permits?  How have permits been used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

 

October 6 and 8

 

Kolstad, Chapter 9

 

October 10, 13 and 15

 

Colby, Bonnie. 2000. Cap-and-Trade Policy Challenges: A Tale of Three Markets Land Economics 76(4) 638-658.

 

Bayon, Ricardo. 2007. A Green Thumb for the Invisible Hand The Milken Institute Review (Second Quarter) 17-25.

 

Goodell, Jeff. 2006. Capital Pollution Solution? The New York Times (July 30).

 

The Economist. 2006. Emissions Offsets:  Upset About Offsets (August 5): 53.

 

The Economist. 2006. Soot, Smoke and Mirrors (November 18): 54.

 

The Economist. 2007. Economics Focus: Doffing the Cap (June 16th) 86.

 

Smith, Kevin. 2006. Obscenity of Carbon Trading BBC News (November 11).

 

Europe Emission Scheme

 

*Pizer, William A. 2006. The Evolution of a Global Climate Change Agreement American Economic Review 96(2): 26-30.

 

*Nordhaus, William D. 2006. After Kyoto:  Alternative Mechanisms to Control Global Warming. American Economic Review 96 (2): 31-34.

 

*Olmstead, Shiela M. and Robert N. Stavins. 2006. An International Policy Architecture for the Post-Kyoto Era. American Economic Review 96(2): 35-38.

 

*Ferraro, Paul J. and Agnes Kiss. Direct Payments to Conserve Biodiversity. Science (November 29, 2002): 1718.

 

*Hahn and Hester. 1989. Marketable Permits: Lessons for Theory and Practice. Ecology Law Quarterly 16: 361-406.

 

*Tietenberg, Tom. 2003. The Tradable-Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons:  Lessons for Climate Change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19 (3): 400-419.

 


Midterm Examination: Friday, October 17


 

D. Regulation Under Uncertainty

 

October 27, 29 and 31

How can regulation be effective if information is imperfect?  How can pollution levels be monitored and enforced? 

 

Kolstad, Chapters 10 and 11

 

*Goulder, Lawrence H. and Ian W.H. Parry. 2008. Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(2) 152-174.

 

*Pindyck, Robert S. 2007. Uncertainty in Environmental Economics Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(1) 45-65.

 

E. Risk

 

November 3 and 5

How can risk and uncertainty be incorporated into our models? How do we value of life?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 12

 

Viscusi, W. Kip. The Value of Life New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 2nd edition.

 

Meiners, Roger and Bruce Yangle. 1998. The Common Law: How it Protects the Environment The Property and Environment Research Center, PERC Policy Series: May 1998.

 

F. International/Interregional Competition

 

November 7 and 10

What is the relationship between income and environmental quality?  Will free trade result in environmental degradation?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 13

 

Kahn, Matthew E. 2006. Green Cities:  Urban Growth and the Environment.  Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Chapters 3 and 4.

 

*Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1993. The Case for Free Trade. Scientific American (November) 42-49.

 

*Daly, Herman E. 1993. The Perils of Free Trade. Scientific American (November) 50-57.

 

Environmental Performance Index

 

*Copeland, Brian R. and M. Scott Taylor. 2004. Trade, Growth, and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature XLII (March): 7-71.

 

G. Economy-Wide Effects of Environmental Regulations

 

November 12 and 14

Do environmental regulations reduce growth?  Can the quality of the environment be integrated into traditional measures of output?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 14

 

The Economist.  2005. Are You Being Served? (April 23): 76-78.

 

Kahn, Matthew E. 2006. Green Cities:  Urban Growth and the Environment.  Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Chapters 2 and 5.

 

IV. Economic Valuation

 

A. Introduction

 

November 17

Should we place a value on the environment?  Are current approaches for valuing the environment technically sound?

 

Sagoff, Mark. Can We Put a Price on Nature's Services? Pages 16-23 in Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Environmental Issues (9th edition).

 

Abromovitz, Janet N. Putting a Value on Nature's "Free" Services.  In Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Environmental Issues (9th edition).

 

Gatto and DeLeo.  Pricing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services:  The Never-Ending Story.  Pages 41-52 in Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Environmental Issues (12th edition).

 

Morrison How Much is Clean Water Worth? Pages 36-40 in Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Environmental Issues (12th edition)

 

Costanza, Robert and Ralph d'Arge. 1997. The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature 387: 253-260.

 

Ecosystem Valuation

 

Ecosystem Marketplace

 

November 19 and 21

 

Kolstad, Chapter 15

 

B. Hedonic Price Method

 

November 24

Can we use market transactions to infer how people value goods that are not explicitly traded on a market?  How robust/controversial is this technique?  What are some of its limitations?

 

Kolstad, Chapter 16

 

Mahan, B.L., S. Polasky, and R. M. Adams. 2000. Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Approach Land Economics 76(1): 100-113.

 

Pyndyck R. S. and D. L. Rubenfeld. 2005. Appendix: The Basics of Regression. In Microeconomics (6th edition) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

 

Kennedy, Peter. 1998. A Guide to Econometrics [electronic resource] Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

 

*Lutzenhiser, Margot and Noelwah R. Netusil. 2001. The Effect of Open Spaces on a Home's Sale Price. Contemporary Economic Policy 19 (3) 291-298.

 

C. Defensive Expenditures and the Travel Cost Method

 

November 26

 

Kolstad, Chapter 17 (to page 34)

 

Abdalla, Charles W., Brian A. Roach, and Donald J. Epp. 1992. Valuing Environmental Quality Changes Using Averting Expenditures: An Application to Groundwater Contamination Land Economics 68(2): 163-169.

December 1

 

Kolstad, Chapter 17 (to end)

 

Loomis, John. 2002. Quantifying Recreation Use Values from Removing Dams and Restoring Free-Flowing Rivers: A Contingent Behavior Travel Cost Demand Model for the Lower Snake River. Water Resources Research 38 (6) 1-8.

 

D. Contingent Valuation

 

December 3 and 5

Is the contingent valuation method "valid"?  What are the major criticisms of this valuation technique?  What are the advantages of using this approach?

 

Portney, Paul R. 1994. The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall) 3-17.

 

Hanemann, W. Michael. 1994. Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall) 19-43.

 

Diamond, Peter A. and Jerry A. Hausman. 1994. Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall) 45-64.

 

Loomis, John B. 1996. How Large is the Extent of the Market for Public Goods: Evidence from a Nationwide Contingent Valuation Survey. Applied Economics 28: 779-782.

 

December 8 and 10

 

Kolstad, Chapter 18

 

Aadland, David and Arthur J. Caplan. 2006. Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 25(4): 855-874.

 

Cristie, Mike et al. 2006. Valuing the Diversity of Biodiversity. Ecological Economics 58: 304-317.

 

Shogren, Jason F. and Laura O. Taylor. 2008. On Behavioral-Environmental Economics Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(1) 26-44.

 

*Shogren, Jason F. 2006.  Valuation in the Lab. Environmental & Resource Economics 34: 163-172.

 

*Freeman, A. Myrick. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theories and Methods (2nd edition). Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

 

*Heal, Geoffrey. 2000. Nature and the Marketplace: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services Washington, DC: Island Press.

 


Assignment List, Due Dates, and Exam Schedule

 

The following is a list of assignments and due dates. All assignments are due in class on the date listed below. In fairness to other students, late assignments will be penalized 1/2 grade for each day or partial day past the due date. Assignments handed in more than 3 days after the due date will not be accepted.

 

Examinations:

 

The comprehensive final exam will given during final exam week. This examination is currently scheduled for Thursday, December 18th from 9am-noon, but may change due to scheduling conflicts. The exact date and time of the final will be confirmed in the second part of the semester by the Registrar's Office.

 

Problem Sets:

 

Distributed

Due

Problem Set #1

September 17th

September 24th

Problem Set #2

October 1st

October 8th

Problem Set #3

November 12th

November 19th

 

Project Assignment Due Dates: 

 

Due

Project Preference

October 1st

Group tasks and preliminary literature review

November 12th

Paper Due

At the start of the final exam on Thursday, December 18th